Not quite done yet.

There are still so many things that are left to be brought up, though you needed to go.

I challenge you to explain away actual examples of things. As to questions of the validity of use of someone born in the dastardliest of circumstances.

A baby, born of a prostitute, that comes to do God's work.

Seriously, no need to make things up, but I find that the family is a nice way to bring forth weapons of God, but it hardly needs to be the only way, punishable as some sin if it isn't followed through.

God is a man of opportunity (and by man, I'm not referring to it in the normal sense, that should be obvious). He will use the resources at hand, and he hardly even has need to do that if he created the whole universe.

If all of your brothers and sisters are meant to have a tenure on Earth, what is to happen at it's end? Why twice are we to have a body? Why then are children allowed to parish, or do you believe that they come again?

Sorry to be stubborn, but you kept saying how the Family was part of God's plan, without ever mentioning his plan really, or how it actually played a part.

The family is hardly uncorruptable. I have many real world examples where it would have been much better for the individual to have cast off familial ties if they were able. It hardly seems, again, that the term should be used so irrefutably to the point that it can't be argued with.

It's hardly only a tool of good.

I just believe that it's meant to be a bastion of strenght. It's meant to be a citidel of trust. It's meant to be an armory and a wall to return behind to find strength and comfort.

It's hardly a necessity, but merely a boon for you to use as it was intended.

I don't see there is, or needs to be, some punishment inherrent there if you shouldn't use it as it was intended (meaning starting your own).

Though, if you abuse it, obviously every sort of abuse needs be dealt with, and will in time.

Now, I think I am done. I just wanted you to understand.

I don't say things idly out of some inner hate, or need to be right, but I do believe that things need to be tied up in nice little bundles. Most especially the truths of the universe. They are meant to be blocks to build on, then the must have a definate and reliable shape.

"Commandments" that are prone to qualifiers and circumstance don't to me spell out a definate shape to be had. And if one of the speakers for the great architect are saying something's square, when it obviously isn't, then yes, I will disagree with them. They might bring forth the message of God, but you can hardly believe that everything of which they utter is such.